So, the news from Virginia hit the front pages of the local papers this morning, and now,
the fallout starts.Duck and cover, people!
I’m also wondering, how long before they start going after computer games as well, seeing as how the boy in question was a fan of
”violent video games, particularly Counterstrike, a hugely popular online game, in which players join terrorism or counterterrorism groups and try to shoot each other using all types of guns”.
Original article here Though, to play Devil’s Advocate, gotta wonder – might it be better if firearms were MORE available?
Things is, gun control might work if
no one has access to firearms (assuming you back it up with other measures), but considering that the genie is already out of the bottle, perhaps education and familiarity might work better.
Simply banning the sale of guns seems criminally irresponsible when there is already a fairly large pool of existing firearms floating around.
For instance, if I start waving a rifle around in an army camp, depending on my body language (and/or the presence/absence of a magazine in the rifle), one of two things will happen –
1) People start jeering, usually accompanied by rude jokes about over-compensating, while a hail of assorted projectiles comes my way. These projectiles will take the form of ring pulls, coins, pebbles, boots and other (relatively) harmless odds and sods.
2) Everyone starts ducking while other rifles get loaded and swung round to face me, while someone shouts at me to put the gun down or else….
Having done the one and seen (and helped clean up) the consequences of the other, I can’t help but wonder if things might have worked out very differently if other students (or teachers or university staff) had been armed as well.